Sunday, June 5, 2016

Twitter vs. Graphic Content


The questions have been posed, “Should Twitter, as an immediate publication platform, take steps to remove or censor graphic content?  And, as an autonomous, third-party commercial enterprise, is Twitter’s oversight of posted content ethical?”

Terminology

To answer this, I first have to define graphic content. 

“The Twitter Rules” describes graphic content as being pornographic or excessively violent (Twitter, n.d.).  The social media site prohibits the use of this type of content in a user’s profile image or header image (Twitter, n.d.).  However, they “may allow some forms of graphic content in Tweets marked as sensitive media (Twitter, n.d).”  And lastly, they also forbid “gratuitous images of death” (Twitter, 2015). 

While this is helpful, I must also understand the meanings of “pornographic” and “excessively violent” in order to be able to identify content of this nature.  Because Twitter does not clarify their interpretation of these terms, I turn to the all-knowing Google search engine. 

Here, the first search result for “what is pornography” was a basic definition: Pornography is printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.  Furthermore, no exact results populated from my search for “what is the definition of excessive violence…..”




Breaking the Questions Down

Should Twitter take steps to remove pornographic content?

My answer to this is ‘no,’ unless the images involve a minor child or an incapacitated adult. 
·      Online child pornography is strictly covered by the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA), which has very clear guidelines.  And please note that what these guidelines do not prohibit are images of children just because they are naked.  Thus, the candid bathtub pictures that seem to be an inherent part of childhood would not need to be excluded. 
·      Incapacitated adults (even if the incapacity is self-inflicted), cannot truly consent to being included in a pornographic images.


Should Twitter take steps to remove content that depicts excessive violence?

May answer to this is also ‘no,’ with no caveats.



The Rationale

Let the user beware.  If one choses to participate on an open media forum, one should expect the unexpected. 

It’s like entering a public park.  There are basic rules governing how everyone should behave, but the rules cannot include all behaviors; and there will always be people who do not follow the rules.  It’s a risk you take by going out in public (a.k.a. participating in social media). 

It should also be noted that Twitter is rated Mature-17, so young children shouldn’t be using the site.  This squashes the argument that children may see something disturbing.  Parents shouldn’t let their children use this social media site. Period.

For me, the internet (along with television, radio, magazines, etc.) has reached the point of no return; and as such, every user is responsible for taking measures to protect their individual sensitivities.  This means the user is ultimately responsible for the items they view.  If you follow someone and they post something graphic, stop following them.  Don’t open the link. Don’t read the article.  If you’re getting random graphic posts that were not solicited and they offend you, stop using Twitter.

As a society, we have tolerated and/or encouraged so much offensive content that we have become desensitized and oblivious to the extent that this type of content has become the “norm.”  And while we started accepting foul language, sexual images and violent actions into our everyday entertainment regime, we didn’t notice that our characters were changing for the worse.  We lost our sense of integrity as we were groveling for more sensational media content. 

However, Twitter is a publicly traded company.  So if their leadership determines that it is the best interest of their company to ban graphic content because of the values of the organization, or because they fear the financial consequences otherwise, then that is their prerogative. But I feel the decision is solely theirs, and it should not be dictated by regulators or demanded by users.

If users don’t like the content to which they are exposed, they should ban Twitter until the rules change.  Otherwise, no reforms to our media content will ever occur, because almost no one has the energy, the desire or the patience to define his or her values and then stick to them………




Reference


Twitter.  (n.d.)  How can we help?: The Twitter Rules.  Retrieved on June 5, 2016 from https://support.twitter.com/articles/18311.

No comments:

Post a Comment